wîcihitowin

adailyriot:

theinvisiblecommission:

this is your god

I AM ANDREW JACKSON AND I AM A HITLER’S GREATEST INSPIRATION

(Source: militant-mind)

(Source: missgreyday)

ihavethisblog:

bbanzaiz:

vsquaredk:

miss-deadpool:

this-is-not-native:

miss-deadpool:

miss-deadpool:

cptkida:

this-is-not-native:

THIS SHIT IS OFFENSIVE.

Hey brah, ima need you to take that thing off and stop tagging things “red indian” because that phrase is offensive when you use it, mmmk?

/\ you’re a fucking moron.

ALSO BITCH-ON-HER-HIGH-HORSE:

Definition of RACISM

1

: a belief that race is the primary determinant of human traits and capacities and that racial differences produce an inherent superiority of a particular race

2

: racial prejudice or discrimination

This is from MERRIAM-WEBSTER

This girl has not done a god damn thing to suggest she thinks that the racial differences of “red indians” make them inferior, nor whites superior. She has not demonstrated prejudice.

IN FACT… she did the OPPOSITE of discrimination… she included this cultured accessory in her ensemble. She welcomed it into her wardrobe.

You’re the ignorant fucking idiot, chick.

So you’re saying racial slurs are just fine if you aren’t being using them to be mean? Oh dear. The use of the phrase “red Indian,” is, in fact, suggesting racial inferiority, whether you meant it that way or no.

Please read the link I originally posted as to why “including cultured accessories” (hint hint, war bonnets are not accessories) is Not Okay. Do you really think the argument “but I meant it in a good way!” is anything we haven’t heard a thousand times before?

In history text books I am referred to as a “white” whereas other races are referred to as their official nomenclature i.e. “Native Americans” or “African Americans.” I don’t bitch because no one calls me “English American” or “Caucasian American” and you can’t honestly try to claim a difference between “Red Indian” and “Whites”

The difference? I’m not bitching because I know it’s not something I should take offensively.

AAAAAND by the way… next time it’s sunny out you better just bend over and take it because sunglasses were invented in 12th century China… it’s a significant part of their historical and cultural garb, and according to your values it would be offensive and racist for anyone but a Chinese person to sport such an item.

Hi

Chinese person here. Please get your fucking facts straight.

Sunglasses? they were NOT of massive cultural significance. Do you KNOW what they were for? They were used by judges to SHIELD THE EYES. because no matter how much you school your face, your eyes give you away.

What do we use sunglasses for nowadays? TO SHIELD THE EYES.

Offensive would be someone not buddhist wearing this:

without giving ANY fucking thought about what it means, just because it’s cool. Or having this somewhere in their house:

without any fucking thought about what all it even IS. JUST BECAUSE IT’S FUCKING PRETTY.

so how about you think about what the headdress MEANS to the people complaining before continuing with your bull?

Yes! Take THAT!

Ignorant white girl got owned. 

lastrealindians:

Photo provided by Frank White Bull (Hunkpapa Lakota -White Bull Graphics) -gives perspectives if the tables were turned and Whites were used as mascots. Although it is impossible to impart the dynamics of the colonizer-colonized relations.

In Lakota, ‘wasicu’ means ‘takes the fat,’- the term was used to describe Europeans who came to the U.S. and stole land from natives, killed, were disrespectful to nature and animals, and basically raped and pillaged.